Working Papers

The IOF Working Paper Series has been introduced to serve as a ‘placeholder’ for papers that are destined for publication in the primary literature. This series makes our work available in a timely fashion, and well before the works appear in the primary literature. It will also help us to get timely comments from colleagues, both at IOF and world-wide.

Another advantage of having a Working Paper Series is the ability to cite a working paper, which most journals would not allow you to do with an unpublished manuscript.
Note: Some journals do not allow this. Authors are advised to check before they publish a working paper.


#2019-05 U. Rashid Sumaila & Travis C. Tai (2019) Ending overfishing can mitigate impacts of climate change . IOF Working Papers 2019 (05), 18pp., Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia.

Abstract: Marine fish stocks and the ecosystems they inhabit are in decline in many parts of our ocean, including in some European waters, because of overfishing and the ecosystem effect of fishing in general. At the same time, climate change is disrupting the physics, chemistry and ecology of the ocean, with significant consequences on the life it holds. While the positive effects of mitigating climate change on the ocean and marine life are currently being documented, papers that examine how ending overfishing could increase ocean resilience to climate change are less common. The goal of this paper is to review the current literature and conduct an analysis that demonstrate that ending overfishing and reducing other negative ecosystem effects of fishing would make fish stocks and marine ecosystems more resilient to climate change. Our findings suggest that fish are no different from people in that a healthy person is more likely to survive an epidemic than a person who is less healthy.

#2019-04 Brooks A. Kaiser (2019) Growth, Transition, and Decline in Resource Based Socio-Ecological Systems. IOF Working Papers 2019 (04), 56pp., Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia.

Abstract: Globalization transforms communities. Increased trade and technology can disrupt existing socio-ecological systems that may have persisted for hundreds or thousands of years. Whole socio-ecological systems may be destroyed or subsumed into a new dominant culture, as has occurred with many Indigenous cultures worldwide. In this context, I examine the Thule Inuit culture as a dynamic and multi-trophic socio-ecological system. Lessons from the study clarify fundamentals of trade and development: mutual benefits from trade rely upon equitable terms that sustain the original stewards of the ecological resource base; the ability to achieve such equitable terms is a function of governance mechanisms and capabilities; and the need for such institutional tools and governance mechanisms should be internally as well as externally recognized for all trading parties.

The multi-trophic model includes three layers: a composite ecosystem resource base, a resource- dependent human population, and a top trophic human group of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) holders connected through caloric productivity and use. I calibrate the model with what can be known or deduced from the historical record and ecological evidence. I examine how new stressors to the Thule Inuit system, including the foreign commercial whaling and fur trading that brought particularly rapid shifts from the 1820s forward, transformed the system dynamics. Differences in the ways in which the two commercial enterprises evolved across Inuit communities, particularly in terms of net changes in access to calories and new technologies, provide comparative insights into how socio- ecological systems can gain or lose as the introduction of trade and technology can shift relative rates of return amongst ecosystem components.

#2019-03 D. N. Edwards and E. Pinkerton (2019) Priced Out of Ownership: Quota leasing impacts on the financial performance of owner-operators. IOF Working Papers 2019 (03), 14pp., Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia.

Abstract: Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs) have been widely promoted as a means to improve the conservation and economic outcomes of fisheries by enabling the transfer of quota access privileges to the most efficient operators who in turn have a strong financial incentive to safeguard the long-term sustainability of the fishery. The British Columbia Pacific halibut fishery has long been held up as an example of successful ITQ management. An in-depth investigation of this fishery, however, has identified significant failings of the ITQ system. The ownership profile of the fishery has changed dramatically under ITQs, transitioning from predominantly owner-operated to absentee owners and lessee fishermen. An analysis of fishing enterprise financial performance demonstrates the overwhelming impact of leasing on the viability of fishing enterprises. A representative owner-operator fishing enterprise leasing more than 80% of the quota that they fish, which characterizes all of the owner-operators that have entered the fishery since 2001, cannot earn enough from the fishery to re-invest, including replacement of the vessel or purchasing of quota. The fishery, under current leasing and purchase price conditions, is not self-sustaining as an owner-operator fishery. Socio-economic objectives for the fishery are not being met, raising important questions about the design and implementation of ITQ management systems.

#2019-02 D. N. Edwards and E. Pinkerton (2019) The Hidden Role of Processors in an Individual Transferable Quota Fishery. IOF Working Papers 2019 (02), 18pp., Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia.

Abstract: The economically and culturally important Pacific halibut fishery in British Columbia, Canada, managed as an Individual Transferable Quota fishery since 1993, has frequently been held up as an example of management best practices. This narrative of success has continued despite repeated warnings that there are serious problems with the fishery, including processors exerting ever greater control over the fishery, contrary to stated fisheries objectives. Administrative data from federal and provincial datasets were used to consider ownership and control in the halibut fishery, with a focus on processor quota ownership, leasing, and brokerage of leases. The analysis indicates that direct processor ownership of halibut quota, while more than doubling between 1996 and 2016, remains relatively low at less than 10% of the available quota. Processor control through the leasing of halibut, however, is much higher, accounting for more than half of all halibut quota transfers in 2016. Through strategies such as “holding licences”, processors increasingly act as hubs for leasing activity, which has shifted the balance of power in the fishery. This analysis (a) reveals that there is much more processor control than is obvious from a cursory review of ownership, (b) highlights approaches for assessing the level of processor control, and (c) recommends alternative government procedures for improving transparency and evaluating full spectrum outcomes of fisheries management such as equitable distribution of benefits.

#2019-01 D.N. Edwards (2019) Rise of the Investor Class in the British Columbia Pacific Halibut Fishery. IOF Working Papers 2019 (01), 15pp., Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia.

Abstract: Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs) have been promoted as a management approach to address many of the economic and conservation challenges encountered in fisheries. ITQs are expected to improve fishery outcomes based on assumptions about who owns the quota, how ownership is transferred and how ownership incentivizes stewardship. Changes in the ownership profile of the British Columbia Pacific halibut fishery were examined over a 25-year period. This analysis revealed that despite the halibut fishery being a traditionally owner-operator fishery, with owner-operators owning and catching more than 90% of the halibut in 1991, owner-operators have been increasingly marginalized in the fishery, catching 45% of the halibut in 2016 and owning 15% of the quota. The original grantees of quota from 1991 continue to own over half of the quota, and original grantees comprised half of the owner-operators active in the fishery in 2016. However, these original grantees have been steadily becoming a new investor class, non-existent in 1991, alongside new investors that have bought into the fishery as a source of income from leasing. A new dynamic has emerged in the fishery, with the separation of quota ownership from fishing operations. This raises questions about the assumptions underpinning the rationale for ITQs as an efficient market-based mechanism for fishery management and as a means to improve stewardship incentives. Also questionable are the equity, the long-term viability, and the objectives this fishery is serving with this new ownership structure.

CORU/IIED March 2019 William WL Cheung, Vicky WY Lam and Colette CC Wabnitz (2019) Future scenarios and projections for fisheries on the high seas under a changing climate. Changing Oceans Research Group / International Institute for Environment and Development - Working Paper 2019, 43pp.

Abstract: Marine biodiversity and ecosystems provide important benefits to human societies through fisheries. But the benefits are not shared equally among countries – and climate change will only exacerbate inequalities. Improving high seas fisheries governance would help redistribute benefits and reduce climate risks, especially in developing countries where many people depend on fish for their food and nutrition security, livelihoods and well-being. Developing countries are also among the most vulnerable to climate change impacts. Here, the authors explore different scenarios of future fisheries governance and evaluate the benefits and trade-offs of alternative policy frameworks for governing fisheries under a changing climate.

#2018-01 Foster, Sarah J., Kuo, Ting-Chun, Wan, Anita Kar Yan, and Vincent, Amanda C.J. (2018) Global Seahorse trade defies export bans under CITES action and national legislation. IOF Working Papers 2018 (01), 18pp., Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia.

Abstract: Illegal trade undermines efforts to achieve sustainable use of wildlife, including marine fishes. This study investigated the illegal trade of seahorses, among the first taxa of marine fishes to come under global trade restrictions. Seahorses are listed in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). This designation allows exports of specimens that are sourced sustainably and legally (within CITES rules). However, all countries historically exporting large numbers of seahorses have since banned trade or are under CITES export suspensions. In particular, Thailand, previously considered the source of about 75% of all wild dried seahorses, suspended exports in January 2016. To investigate global compliance, 220 interviews were conducted with traders in Hong Kong Specialist Administrative Region (hereafter Hong Kong SAR), the largest entrepôt for dried seahorses. This study sought to understand current sources of seahorses (2016-17) and relative volumes from each source. Traders reported obtaining dried seahorses from many countries with bans on seahorse exports, most notably Thailand and the Philippines. Indeed, it is estimated that almost all dried seahorses in Hong Kong SAR (95%) had been imported from source countries despite export bans being in place, indicating a widespread lack of enforcement. More broadly, trade regulations, including bans, are likely to be undermined when indiscriminate extraction persists, as with seahorses in bottom trawls and other non-selective fishing methods. Attention must be directed at managing extraction as well as increasing enforcement of trade bans.

OceanCanada #2018-01 Graham Epstein, Evan Andrews, Derek Armitage, Paul Foley, Jeremy Pittman, Rebecca Brushett (2018). The impacts of species portfolios and democratic rulemaking on fisher support for addressing ecosystem trade-offs in fisheries: lessons from Northern Peninsula, Newfoundland OceanCanada Working Paper #2018-01, (Full text)

#2017-06 Nathan Bendriem, Raphael Roman, Darah Gibson, and U. Rashid Sumaila. Wild vs. Farmed: Selected Review of a Dichotomized Status of Coho Salmon in British Columbia OceanCanada Working Paper #2017-06, (Full text)
#2017-05 Darah Gibson and U. Rashid Sumaila. Socio-economic Contribution of Small-scale Versus Large-scale Fisheries in British Columbia OceanCanada Working Paper #2017-05, (Full text)
#2017-04 Berdej, S., Armitage, D. and J. Silver. Reflecting on issues of governance and socialecological ‘fit’ in the Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasaii) fishery: Sitka, Alaska and Haida Gwaii, B.C. OceanCanada Working Paper #2017-04, (Full text)
#2017-03 Darah Gibson and U. Rashid Sumaila. How Small-Scale Are Fisheries in British Columbia? OceanCanada Working Paper #2017-03, (Full text)
#2017-02 Travis C. Tai, Tim Cashion, Vicky W. Y. Lam, Wilf Swartz and U. Rashid Sumaila. Ex-vessel fish price database: disaggregating prices for low-priced species from reduction fisheries. OceanCanada Working Paper #2017-02, (Full text)
#2017-01 Evan Andrews & Derek Armitage. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Regime Shifts in Coastal Fishery Systems: A Case Study of a Potential Regime Shift in a Shrimp Fishery System in Northern Newfoundland, Canada OceanCanada Working Paper #2017-01, (Full text)

Working Papers archive